‘Fact check’ has become just another word for censorship

By Douglas Murray, commentary | New York Post

“Fact-checking” is like “fake news”: something that is now entirely in the eye of the beholder.

At the vice presidential debate this week, the CBS moderators once again tried to show that they were the fair and impartial people in the room

Except that — as with the Trump-Harris debate — they only seemed interested in fact-checking in one direction. Against the Republican.

On Tuesday night, the subject of Springfield, Ohio, once again came up. And once again, Springfield revealed one of the big problems of this media era.

READ THE FULL STORY AT THE NEW YORK POST

Editor’s note: Opinions expressed in commentary pieces are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the management of the Rocky Mountain Voice, but even so we support the constitutional right of the author to express those opinions.

‘Fact check’ has become just another word for censorship

By Douglas Murray, commentary | New York Post

“Fact-checking” is like “fake news”: something that is now entirely in the eye of the beholder.

At the vice presidential debate this week, the CBS moderators once again tried to show that they were the fair and impartial people in the room

Except that — as with the Trump-Harris debate — they only seemed interested in fact-checking in one direction. Against the Republican.

On Tuesday night, the subject of Springfield, Ohio, once again came up. And once again, Springfield revealed one of the big problems of this media era.

READ THE FULL STORY AT THE NEW YORK POST

Editor’s note: Opinions expressed in commentary pieces are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the management of the Rocky Mountain Voice, but even so we support the constitutional right of the author to express those opinions.