By Tasha Carr | Guest Commentary, Larimer League of Independent Voters
Voters have the right to ensure that our votes are counted correctly. The Risk-limiting Audit (RLA) is the only method available for Colorado voters to be assured that wrong election outcomes are detected and fixed.
Yet, the RLAs in Colorado have little chance of fixing any incorrect outcomes because the Secretary of State is violating key assumptions of the RLAs and not complying with best practices.
Fundamental to RLAs is the statistical concept of a risk limit. In plain English, the risk limit is the risk (chance) of not discovering and fixing wrong election outcomes. To ensure our elections are valid, we want the chance of missing a wrong outcome to be very low. But the risk limit only applies to the contests that are selected to be audited, and typically Sec. Griswold selects contests that do not require very many ballots to be audited. This is a significant problem for the contests that are not selected.
READ THE FULL COMMENTARY AT THE LARIMER LEAGUE OF INDEPENDENT VOTERS
Editor’s note: Opinions expressed in commentary pieces are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the management of the Rocky Mountain Voice, but even so we support the constitutional right of the author to express those opinions.