
By Joseph E. Schmitz | Commentary, The Daily Signal
On June 18, the U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee will hold a hearing on the concealment of former President Joe Biden’s cognitive decline. This hearing will start to shed a congressional light on the apparent misuse of the presidential autopen. According to President Donald Trump’s June 4, memorandum, “This conspiracy marks one of the most dangerous and concerning scandals in American history.”
The chief speechwriter for President Ronald Reagan, Kenneth Khachigian, published an article on May 30 in The Wall Street Journal, which concludes that Americans have been “cynically hoodwinked,” so much so that “Mr. Biden’s using an autopen”—assuming he actually knew about it—“and Attorney General [Merrick] Garland’s declining to release the audio of the president’s interview with Robert Hur are small potatoes amid this vast whitewash of history.”
Small potatoes amid a vast whitewash of false narratives by “domestic enemies” need to be exposed to the public—because those small potatoes will lead to bigger potatoes of deceit.
As Khachigian aptly points out: “Each day that an investigation is delayed, staffers in the Biden White House and on the Biden and Harris Campaigns—along with members of Mr. Biden’s administration and Democratic Party operatives—might be destroying records, replacing cellphones and following Hillary Clinton’s example by wiping their email servers.”
The good news is Justice Department Pardon Attorney Ed Martin, according to one article, “is looking into the electronic signatures on the former president’s last-minute pardons ‘because the American people deserve answers.’”
The Senate Judiciary Committee and Martin need to shed a bright light on the truth for the American people. Any person who committed a crime in the cover-up of Biden’s cognitive impairment should be prosecuted.
READ THE FULL ARTICLE AT THE DAILY SIGNAL
Editor’s note: Opinions expressed in commentary pieces are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the management of the Rocky Mountain Voice, but even so we support the constitutional right of the author to express those opinions.