Antifa’s history is not what its defenders claim

By Jerry Dunleavy | Just the News

The U.S.-based Antifa movement has embraced the label and symbols of Germany's "Antifaschistische Aktion" — a Communist group whose actions enabled the Nazis to take power.

The modern iteration of the militant Antifa movement draws its name, symbolism, and inspiration from Antifaschistische Aktion — a project of the German Communist Party in the 1920s and 1930s which targeted center-left parties as the true fascist enemy and aided in the rise to power of Adolf Hitler and the Nazi Party.

Antifaschistische Aktion was founded in 1932 by the Communist Party of Germany (KPD), which viciously opposed the more moderate leftist Social Democratic Party of Germany (SPD), dividing the opposition and directly contributing to the successful rise of the National Socialist German Workers’ Party (NSDAP) — the Nazi Party — and the eventual establishment of Hitler’s dictatorship.

The first Trump Administration repeatedly sought to go after the far-left American movement known as Antifa, and now, in the wake of violent anti-ICE protests and the assassination of Charlie Kirk, President Donald Trump has designated Antifa as a “domestic terrorism organization.” 

The modern iteration of Antifa seeks to burnish its anti-fascist bona-fides by linking itself through its name and its two-flagged banner to purported efforts by Antifaschistische Aktion to oppose Hitler and the Nazis, but the actual history of Germany’s Antifa movement is much more complicated than that.

Modern “Antifa”: Rewriting history

The German Left was deeply divided during the years between the First and Second World Wars, as the SPD often attempted to defend the Weimar constitution and to preserve some of the Weimar Republic’s democratic institutions against both a Nazi fascist state and a Communist one, while the radical KPD, subordinated by Joseph Stalin’s Comintern, sought a Soviet-style revolution in Germany.

The democratic German Weimar Republic, established in the wake of Germany’s defeat in World War One, was beset by massive economic problems flowing from the Great Depression, intense hyperinflation, political instability, and constant street battles between paramilitary groups, including those backed by Communists and Nazis. The German Antifa played a key role in the German Communist Party’s successful efforts to kneecap the SPD, contributing to Hitler and the Nazis managing to seize power amidst a divided and demoralized opposition.

Mark Bray, the author of Antifa: The Anti-Fascist Handbook, wrote in his 2017 book that “over the past decades, antifa have self-consciously adopted interwar anti-fascist symbols like the two flags of the Antifaschistische Aktion.”

Richard J. Evans, the author of The Third Reich in Power, argued that “the Communists’ violent revolutionary rhetoric, promising the destruction of capitalism and the creation of a Soviet Germany, terrified the country’s middle class who knew only too well what had happened to their counterparts in Russia after 1918.” 

Evans wrote that “appalled at the failure of the government to solve the crisis, and frightened into desperation by the rise of the Communists, they began to leave the squabbling little factions of the conventional political right and gravitate towards the Nazis instead.”

Antifa originated with German Communist Antifaschistische Aktion

Antifa originated with the German Communists, who labeled anyone to their right politically as “fascists” — including the leftwing SDP, who were dubbed “social fascists.”

Bernd Langer, the author of 80 Years of Anti-Fascist Action, contended that “antifascism is more of a strategy than an ideology” and that “it was introduced in Germany in the 1920s by the Communist Party of Germany as an anti-capitalist battle cry.”

Langer’s pamphlet, published by Germany’s Association for the Promotion of Anti-Fascist Literature and translated using Google Translate, stated that “fascism and antifascism were introduced into the political vocabulary by the KPD as undifferentiated, polemical battle terms” and that “the communists understood antifascism to mean anticapitalism.” Thus, Langer said, “for the KPD, all other parties were fascist, especially the SPD.”

Langer said the flag since adopted by Antifa was created by the German Communist Party: “The emblem with the double flags symbolizing the KPD and SPD (of course, this always meant only the SPD base, not the party as such) in a lifebelt bearing the inscription ‘Antifaschistische Aktion’ (Anti-Fascist Action) appeared from this point on in virtually all KPD publications and demonstrations.”

“The double flags now represent a radical, anti-capitalist symbolism, also used by groups and initiatives that have little to do with autonomous movements,” Langer wrote. “It has become an emblem used across the scene, distinguishing itself from state-supporting antifascism and standing for a militant politics.”

David Karvala, currently a spokesperson for Unity Against Fascism and Racism, said that “the strategy of Antifascist Action can only be understood in the context of the policy of the German Communist Party at the time, which in turn was framed by Stalinism.”

Karvala noted that Stalin’s strategy was to declare that “all of Europe was in the hands of fascism” despite the fact that “in Germany the establishment parties — the Christian Democrats and the Social Democrats — were still in charge.” But “this was no problem for the Stalinist theory,” Karavala wrote, noting that “they were simply branded as fascists” or “social fascists.”

An article in The Jerusalem Post noted that “a 1932 photo of KPD headquarters in Berlin prominently displayed the double-flagged Antifa emblem among other Communist symbols and slogans.” The article added that “in a photo from the 1932 Unity Congress of Antifa in Berlin, the double-flagged banner shared space with the hammer and sickle and with two large cartoons. One supported the KPD; the other mocked the SPD, Germany’s Social Democratic Party.”

German Communists relentlessly targeted leftwing Social Democrats over Nazis

The Soviet Union was the sponsor of Communist revolutionary movements in the 1920s and 1930s, and Josef Stalin, Soviet General Secretary of the Communist Party from 1922 to 1952 and premier considered non-Communist leftwing movements to be fascist.

Stalin declared in 1924 that “Fascism is the bourgeoisie’s fighting organization that relies on the active support of Social-Democracy” and that “Social-Democracy is objectively the moderate wing of fascism.”

The reported mantra of Ernst Johannes Fritz Thälmann — the leader of the German Communist KPD and Stalin’s man in Germany — was that “the Social Democratic forest should not be overlooked when looking at the National Socialist trees.”

Eve Rosenhaft, a historian of modern Germany, wrote: “The Communists’ policy underestimated the specific threat from the National Socialist Party and insisted that the primary attack be directed against the Social Democrats, the majority working-class party known in KPD parlance as ‘social fascists’. As a consequence, so the classic argument goes, the labour movement was divided and incapable of resisting the rise of the Nazis.”

“That so patently absurd a policy should have been possible, historians of the 1940s, 1950s, and early 1960s explained by reference to the ‘Stalinization’ of the KPD. This process, going on throughout the mid-1920s, was said to have made the KPD increasingly monolithic and subservient to the interests of the Soviet political leadership as reflected in the policies of the Communist International, or Comintern,” Rosenhaft wrote. 

“By implication the German party was a puppet of Moscow, the KPD rank and file puppets or passive victims of their leaders — and the movement as a whole presented an image of lifelessness and endless jargon-ridden tedium,” she continued.

Kavala argued that “during the rise of Hitler the KPD, in general, fought against the Nazis, but always from the viewpoint that the SPD was an enemy as or more dangerous than the fascists themselves.”

Karvala also wrote that “under pressure from Moscow, the KPD leadership quickly made it clear that Antifa would oppose not only the Nazis but also the SPD.” The German Communist Party declared in July 1932 that “Anti-Fascist Action means untiring daily exposure of the shameless, treacherous role of the SPD and ADGB [socialist trade union] leaders who are the direct filthy helpers of fascism.”

German historian Hans Coppi Jr., who wrote The KPD in the Antifascist Two-Front War, stated that the 11th Plenum of the Executive Committee of the Communist International in April 1931 “resulted in the KPD downplaying the threat posed by the Nazis.” He wrote that “this dogmatic, ultra-left position” of prioritizing the battle against the SDP over the battle against the Nazis “led to a diminished perception of the real danger posed by the Nazi movement.” 

Coppi, according to a book translated using Google Translate, was the son of KPD member parents whose father had joined the anti-fascist so-called Red Orchestra.

“The KPD saw itself as the only revolutionary force capable of halting and destroying fascism. … This claim to exclusive anti-fascist representation ultimately rendered the fight against the unstoppable rise of German-style fascism ineffective, but also prevented a cross-party mass movement that could have halted the advance of National Socialism,” Coppi wrote. “The KPD, committed to the revolutionary transformation of society, was no longer capable of forming alliances with other anti-fascist forces that rejected this goal.”

Langer stressed that “the KPD was a member of the Comintern from the outset and transformed within a few years into a Stalinist party, ideologically, logistically, and financially dependent on the Moscow headquarters.”

The German Communist Party’s Unity Congress of the Anti-Fascist Action took place in July 1932, with Langer writing that “this was intended to be the grand launch of an initiative aimed at defeating both the SPD and the NSDAP.” Langer noted that “in later years, KPD historiography emphasized only the fight against the NSDAP, but that is only half the truth: anti-fascism was always also a fundamentally anti-capitalist strategy.”

Langer said that “the emergence of the Antifascist Action took place within the well-known substantive/strategic concept of the ‘united front’ policy as defined by the Comintern and did not mark a break with the anti-social democratic line” and noted that “the Antifascist Action was the communist counter-foundation to the Iron Front” — the SDP-led group which a Cambridge University analysis described as “an antifascist organization that resisted the rise of the Nazis in the dying days of the Weimar Republic.”

Opposing “The Iron Front”

Indeed, even the author of The Anti-Fascist Handbook admitted that Antifaschistische Aktion was formed as a direct response to the strength of the Iron Front, which had sought to combat the threat that both Communists and Nazis posed to the survival of the Weimar Republic.

“The popularity of the Iron Front prompted the KPD to form Antifaschistische Aktion as a network of factory cells, neighborhood groups, apartment blocks, and other geographical associations,” Bray wrote. “Rank-and-file social democrats were welcomed into Antifaschistische Aktion, but the KPD was still instructing its operatives ‘to sabotage the Iron Front at every turn.’ … Ultimately the socialists and communists were too preoccupied with each other to recognize that the Nazis were not simply a new variant of traditional counterrevolution.”

The Marxist magazine Cosmonaut also acknowledged that German Communists were focused on hurting their more moderate leftwing opponents rather than solely on stopping a fascist takeover of Germany.

“While the right was unifying behind the Nazis during the 1928-1933 period, the KPD devoted its resources to fighting both the Social-Democrats and the Nazis,” Cosmonaut wrote. “The KPD leadership did advocate action against the SPD, and even reached out to Nazi rank-and-file workers for an alliance against the SPD Union leadership.”

German Communists backed the Nazi coup in Prussia

The German Communists had a history of sometimes collaborating with the Nazis, and even helped the Nazis conduct a coup in Prussia against the SDP just a year or so ahead of Hitler’s takeover of Germany.

“At times, the KPD came worryingly close to the Nazis,” Karvala wrote. “In the Land, or region, of Prussia, in summer 1931, the Nazis began a campaign to overthrow, through a referendum, the SPD’s regional government. Initially the KPD refused to support them, but after the intervention of Moscow, the party supported the fascist campaign.”

The Social Democrats, led by Otto Braun, had led Prussia for years, but “in the summer of 1931, the Communists had formed a common front with the Nazis with the object of overthrowing Braun’s government,” according to the History of the International, written by Julius Braunthal, the Secretary of the Socialist International in the 1950s.

Just before the Prussian coup by the Nazis in 1932, Thälmann had declared: “The SPD’s position in the Prussian state machine is like an iron ball and chain around the feet of German workers […] Today the Social Democrats are the most active factor in creating Fascism in Germany.”

The German Communist Party’s newspaper in November 1931 had published a letter to the “fellow workers” of the Nazi Party, arguing that “as honest fighters against the hunger system, the proletarian supporters of the NSDAP have joined the United Front of the proletariat and carried out their revolutionary duty.”

Karvala noted that, in May 1932, the German Communist Party also “organized a public meeting with the participation of a Nazi speaker and three hundred NSDAP supporters.”

The Nazis and the Stahlhelm — which German History in Documents and Images describes as a “right-wing veteran’s paramilitary group” during the Weimar Republic — pushed for the anti-SDP coup in Prussia, and the German Communists joined in their effort.

“In mid-July 1931, at Moscow’s urging, the KPD suddenly supported the referendum initiated by the Stahlhelm and the NSDAP against the Social Democratic government in Prussia under Otto Braun,” Coppi wrote. “The controversial decision was justified by the argument that it now opened up an opportunity to reach anti-capitalist National Socialist supporters.”

Braunthal wrote that “the Communist party leaders considered the removal of the Social Democratic Party in Prussia as a happy event” and noted that “for eleven months before the coup, they had worked with the Nazis in a campaign to overthrow this government.”

READ THE FULL STORY AT JUST THE NEWS