Why birthrates might quietly reshape America’s political future

By Brian C. Joondeph | Commentary, American Thinker

Politics may be downstream from culture, but culture is downstream from cribs. 

In the U.S. and across the West, who’s having children today will shape who’s running the country tomorrow. In the U.S. and other Western democracies, shifts in fertility, family structure, migration, and well-being are quietly redrawing the political map.

Start with the simplest but most potent fact: elections are not won by ideas alone, but by people. This means new people – babies born, children raised, immigrants integrated, voters replaced.

As conservative commentator Grant Mercer recently put it in his article “Womb Wars: The Future Belongs to Conservatives,” the left may be fighting for ideas, but if it fails to reproduce the next generation, it may already be losing the people for whom those ideas exist.

Let’s unpack three linked claims: first, that children tend to adopt their parents’ politics; second, that conservatives are having more children than liberals; and third, that well-being (happiness, mental health, family satisfaction) matters for childbearing.

Do children follow their parents politically? Yes, to a meaningful but not a monolithic degree. Research shows that children raised in households where politics, values, and community life are strong are more likely to adopt similar ideological orientations. 

For example, Pew Research Center found that most U.S. parents say they pass along both religion and politics to their children. Others noted that the more politically engaged the parents, the stronger the correlation. 

While many children diverge, the parental imprint remains powerful. So, Mercer’s claim that children are “more likely” to follow parental politics has a real basis, though the word “more likely” must be carefully qualified — it’s probable, but not guaranteed.

Are conservative-leaning women having more children than liberal-leaning women? There is credible evidence for an “ideological fertility gap.” Studies by the Institute for Family Studies (IFS) show that, controlling for education, income and location, conservative-identified women report higher desired family size and higher marriage rates at younger ages than liberal-identified women. 

READ THE FULL COMMENTARY AT THE AMERICAN THINKER

Editor’s note: Opinions expressed in commentary pieces are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the management of the Rocky Mountain Voice, but even so we support the constitutional right of the author to express those opinions.