By DataRepublican | Commentary, DataRepublican’s Substack
Apax Partners, Neville Roy Singham, and the sovereign investors surrounding the DNC’s most important political database
Virtually every major Democratic campaign — presidential, Senate, House, state — accesses its voter data through one platform. NGP VAN has been the de facto sole vendor of the DNC voter file since 2004. Thirty-eight million donors and volunteers in the system. $10 billion in campaign contributions tracked in the 2022 cycle alone. 1.4 billion voter contact attempts. If you’ve ever knocked on a door for a Democrat, your data went into this system. No competing vendor holds a parallel DNC voter file contract.
The company that owns all of it is a London private equity firm called Apax Partners. And four foreign governments hold ownership stakes in Apax.
Who Owns Apax
In 2009 and 2010, Apax sold approximately 10% of its management company — the entity that sits above every fund, controls every investment decision, and collects fees across the entire portfolio — to three sovereign wealth funds:
- China Investment Corporation (CIC): 2.3% of the management company plus EUR 685 million into Apax Europe VII. CIC is wholly owned by the People’s Republic of China. Since January 2020, Chinese regulation requires CIC to have a Party Secretary chairing its board and a functioning CCP committee with embedded authority over major business decisions. Its board is dominated by China officials from the Ministry of Finance, NDRC, People’s Bank of China, and SAFE. And China’s 2017 National Intelligence Law, Article 7, requires all Chinese organizations to “support, assist, and cooperate with national intelligence work.”
- GIC (Singapore): One of two sovereign funds that bought 7.7% of the management company. GIC’s board is chaired by the sitting Prime Minister of Singapore. The same executive chain governs Singapore’s Internal Security Department and Security and Intelligence Division.
- Future Fund (Australia): Together with GIC, bought 7.7% of the management company. This is the control case: independent governance, no known intelligence apparatus concern.
A fourth sovereign investor arrived later:
- Sanabil/PIF (Saudi Arabia): LP investor in Apax funds, disclosed April 2023. Sanabil is a wholly owned subsidiary of Saudi Arabia’s Public Investment Fund. MBS chairs PIF, appoints all board members, and holds no formal oversight mechanism. The Intercept noted that Sanabil was also an LP in Insight Partners, the firm that owned NGP VAN before Apax bought it. Saudi sovereign capital had exposure to Democratic campaign infrastructure through both the seller and the buyer.
A management company stake is not an ordinary fund investment. These stakeholders receive pro-rata economics across all Apax funds, management-company-level financial reporting, and — per industry standard — “protection rights” that typically include board observer seats or approval rights over major corporate events. No public divestiture of any of these stakes has been announced. As of this writing, they all appear to be active.
To sum:
Apax Partners’ management company — the entity that sits above every fund, including the one holding Democratic campaign infrastructure — counts China’s CIC and Singapore’s GIC among its owners. CIC is subject to China’s 2017 National Intelligence Law, which requires all organizations to “support, assist, and cooperate with national intelligence work.” GIC’s board is chaired by Singapore’s sitting Prime Minister, who also oversees the country’s intelligence services.
Nobody Reviewed This
Voter registration data, party affiliation, donor records, and campaign data are not included in CFIUS’s 10 enumerated categories of “sensitive personal data” under 31 CFR 800.241. Health records, biometrics, credit reports, security clearances: all covered. Political identity data is not covered, which raises new questions.
CIC’s 2.3% stake is below CFIUS’s mandatory filing threshold. The 2010 transaction predates FIRRMA‘s 2020 implementing regulations. I couldn’t find a public record of a CFIUS review of either the CIC-Apax stake or the 2021 acquisition of NGP VAN. No congressional hearing has examined this.
The most electorally valuable dataset in America sits in a regulatory dead zone.
READ THE FULL COMMENTARY AT DATAREPUBLICAN’S SUBSTACK
Editor’s note: Opinions expressed in commentary pieces are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the management of the Rocky Mountain Voice, but even so we support the constitutional right of the author to express those opinions.