If your aim is to keep property tax dollars in your pocket, here’s a look at some of your options on Election Day
Coloradans have several options to try to address rising property taxes in 2024.
Coloradans have several options to try to address rising property taxes in 2024.
SOURCE: INDEPENDENCE INSTITUTE On Wednesday, January 24, 2024, Independence Institute’s Energy and Environmental Policy Analyst Jake Fogleman testified on SB24-039 in the Colorado Senate Transportation & Energy Committee. The bill would have amended the state’s statutory definitions of “clean energy” and “clean energy resources” to include nuclear energy. The committee ultimately voted not to pass the bill
Move to Classify Colorado Nuclear as ‘Clean Energy’ Killed Read More »
By Rob Natelson, Independence Institute In 2011, a group of politicians and special interests sued in federal court to void Colorado’s Taxpayer’s Bill of Rights (TABOR). The case was Kerr v. Hickenlooper. The plaintiffs’ primary argument was that TABOR violated the U.S. Constitution’s Guarantee Clause (Article IV, Section 4), which says in part, “The United
Democracies, Republics, and TABOR Read More »
Colorado’s governor, Jared Polis, champions increasing state revenue by eliminating provisions of the tax code that benefit special interests—what state budgeters call “tax expenditures.”
Evaluating Gov. Polis’s Tax Reform Agenda: Tax Expenditures vs. Broad-Based Tax Relief Read More »
Colorado lawmakers are set to consider their first nuclear energy bill of the 2024 legislative session later this week.
Colorado Lawmakers to Consider Pro-Nuclear Bill Read More »
This fifth and final essay recounts what we discovered about (1) the Constitution’s words “natural born Citizen” and (2) the claim that U.S.-born children of illegal immigrants are “birthright citizens.”
How States May Respond to Illegal Immigration, Part V: About Birthright Citizenship Read More »
The issue comes up this way: First, a state makes a decision traditionally associated with defensive war. It may erect barriers, restrict foreign goods, control immigration, or hold prisoners. Then the federal government or private parties sue the state, claiming these subjects are “preempted” by federal law, and the state may do nothing. Federal preemption arguments have had more success than the Constitution justifies.
Understanding the Constitution: How States May Respond to Illegal Immigration—Part IV Read More »
As part of our research into state war powers, my co-author, Andrew T. Hyman, and I examined the scope of “defensive war” as the Founders understood it. In other words, we examined what an American state can, and can’t do, when fighting a defensive war.
Understanding the Constitution: How States May Respond to Illegal Immigration—Part III Read More »
This Part II explains federal and state responsibility in the face of invasion. Further, this Part introduces the topic of trans-national criminal gangs, and how states may respond to them.
Understanding the Constitution: How States May Respond to Illegal Immigration—Part II Read More »
As unauthorized foreigners continue to flood across the Southern border, state officials continue to cast about for solutions. In normal times, the federal government would remedy the problem. But these are not normal times: The administration of President Joe Biden actually seems to be aiding the influx.
How States May Respond to Illegal Immigration Read More »