Rocky Mountain Voice

Tag: Appeals court

“You don’t get to ride both horses”: Appeals court presses both sides in Tina Peters case
Rocky Mountain Voice, State, Top Stories

“You don’t get to ride both horses”: Appeals court presses both sides in Tina Peters case

By Jen Schumann | Rocky Mountain Voice “Reset the clock.” Defense attorney John Case used a football analogy as the Colorado Court of Appeals sorted out timing for oral arguments in Tina Peters’ appeal. It had nothing to do with the case itself—just how much time each side would have. But the aside drew a brief laugh before judges turned to a record years in the making. Defense attorney Peter Ticktin, who represents Peters and spoke with RMV after the hearing, said the depth of the judges’ questions tracked the briefs closely. “This is a big file,” Ticktin said. “This isn’t something you can read in an afternoon. They clearly did the work. They were chasing down each avenue and each argument that we had in our briefs.” Watch the full oral arguments below ...
Defense reply raises stakes in Peters appeal, asks court to order immediate release
Rocky Mountain Voice, State, Top Stories

Defense reply raises stakes in Peters appeal, asks court to order immediate release

By Jen Schumann | Rocky Mountain Voice With oral arguments just days away, Tina Peters’ legal team has raised the stakes in her appeal, filing a reply that no longer asks the Colorado Court of Appeals simply to weigh jurisdiction—but to declare it already lost and order her immediate release. The reply, filed on the Jan. 8 deadline, directly challenges the Attorney General’s position that the court retains authority over the case and frames Peters’ continued imprisonment as unconstitutional.  2026-01-08 A Peters Reply to Peoples ResponseDownload Her attorneys explicitly say the appellate court should find that it lacks jurisdiction and that Peters “must be released from custody forthwith.” The filing follows Peters’ Dec. 23 motion challenging the cou...
Appeals court backs Trump’s right to use National Guard amid Portland chaos
The Post Millennial, Approved, National

Appeals court backs Trump’s right to use National Guard amid Portland chaos

By Hannah Nightingale | The Post Millennial A divided three-judge panel of the US Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit agreed to lift the lower court’s order blocking the use of the Oregon National Guard. A US appeals court has ruled that the Trump administration can deploy Oregon Natioanl Guard troops to Portland. This comes after a district court judge blocked the administration from deploying both Oregon and other states’ National Guards to Portland to help protect the ICE facility there that has seen nightly unrest since June.  A divided three-judge panel of the US Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit agreed to lift the lower court’s order blocking the use of the Oregon National Guard, per CBS News.  The judges wrote in their descision, "After considering the...
Appeals court rejects Trump bid to pause federal funding freeze ruling
Approved, National, Washington Examiner

Appeals court rejects Trump bid to pause federal funding freeze ruling

By Jack Birle | Washington Examiner A federal appeals court rejected the Trump administration‘s efforts to pause federal aid through an Office of Management and Budget memorandum Wednesday, upholding a lower court’s ruling. The Trump administration attempted to pursue a blanket pause of federal aid disbursements pending a review of the various spending items in January, but the order was blocked by a federal circuit court after several lawsuits, including one by more than a dozen state attorneys general. Despite the Trump administration rescinding the memo, the court still pushed forward with haulting the blanket pause. READ THE FULL STORY AT WASHINGTON EXAMINER
Appeals court says reduction in parenting time, even a substantial one, is not a ‘restriction’
Approved, coloradopolitics.com, State

Appeals court says reduction in parenting time, even a substantial one, is not a ‘restriction’

By Michael Karlik | Colorado Politics Colorado's second-highest court ruled for the first time on Thursday that even if a judge substantially reduces the amount of time a parent may spend with their child, it is not a "restriction" that requires a heightened justification. A three-judge panel for the Court of Appeals acknowledged that under its interpretation of the law, a judge could theoretically slash a parent's time with their child to a single overnight visit a year without having to find the child's health or development is endangered. "In any event, if the General Assembly wishes to establish some threshold of purely quantitative change that would require more than merely being in the child’s best interests, it is of course free to do so," wrote Judge Ted C. Tow III in the ...

FD863768-0ACF-495E-9D21-2EF784DFFA6B[1]

Join us at RMV's Freedom Festival

Click Here for Tickets!

This will close in 0 seconds