By Just the News Contributor | Just the News
Whether Fauci was legally entitled to invoke Fifth Amendment may ultimately depend on how courts balance broad immunity conferred in Biden pardon against remaining risk of post-pardon criminal exposure.
Dr. Anthony Fauci, who helped lead the country’s COVID pandemic response, invoking the constitutional right against self-incrimination last week during a contentious Senate hearing on the response and the virus’s origins has sparked a fierce legal – and political – debate whose origins date back to a late-1800s Supreme Court decision and that will likely be resolved in court.
Sen. Rand Paul, the Senate committee chairman, argues the constitutional privilege no longer applies because the sweeping, preemptive pardon former President Joe Biden granted Fauci in 2025 extinguished any realistic threat of federal prosecution for the conduct under investigation.
The Kentucky Republican senator also characterized Fauci’s repeated invocations as legally unsupported and announced that the committee will vote next week on whether to hold the former National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases director, in contempt of Congress.
Fauci’s attorneys strongly disagree.
READ THE FULL ARTICLE AT JUST THE NEWS